{"requested":"opengov:457","threadKey":"opengov:457","generation":"f0833529285a8e48","total":1,"rows":[{"commentId":"s6af651fd35b7755fee769177","parentId":null,"replyToId":null,"author":{"account":{"accountId":"0xaebfc0f0232c4a23c29dba65a33f7611db55e924e4b0a65950694b857e33764b","address":"14x8J6Hei8CmnhUVysFKbmF6wjLfWYrBvfxjYySQ2Fd1sq5p","emoji":"🏵","tag":null,"identity":{"display":"caybach","verified":true,"email":"","web":"https://cypress.work/","twitter":"@TienCypress"},"profile":null},"legacyName":null},"body":"Referenda #451, #454, and #455 are already receiving overwhelming Nay votes and are unlikely to pass. Missing preimages may be technical mistakes, not malicious intent.\n\nSlashing deposits without clear evidence of malicious intent or an immediate threat could set a dangerous precedent, discouraging independent community members from submitting proposals.\n\nEventually, only core team members or those backed by them may dare to propose anything.\n\nOpenGov should protect the freedom to propose and disagree, not just the power of the majority to decide.","bodyFormat":"markdown","hidden":false,"hiddenReason":null,"deleted":false,"createdAt":"2026-11-12T23:55:41.137Z","editedAt":null,"revision":0,"upvotes":0,"source":{"name":"subsquare","id":"6af651fd35b7755fee769177","cid":null,"height":1},"position":{"side":"Nay","conviction":"Locked5x","balance":"4602087654103634277","weighted":"23010438270518171385"},"media":{},"replies":[]}],"updates":[],"nextCursor":null,"positionsComplete":true,"locked":false}